However, the guides and grids are very helpful. In this sense, the OpenShot assistants, although they do not have as many possibilities, also reduce the margin of error. Its use requires a certain degree of expertise and trial and error as there is no way to see how it combines with the video clip until it is overlapped. Unlike OpenShot, which requires the installation of external programs for the creation of animated titles, Kdenlive has its own. Personally, I feel more comfortable working with drop-down menus and keyboard shortcuts than with the mouse, and the ones in Kdenlive are really adaptable Kdenlive allows you to change the style of the icons and the color theme Those of us who use free software are serious about the lack of a video editing program that is really a guarantee to do serious work, of a good level. Hello, in reality they are used to make small assemblies, unfortunately they do not come close to professional systems and when I have tried to do something creative, they fall short in all possibilities.
Let's see the comment that ccantor made in my previous article: I have used Adobe Premiere Pro, but not at the level of a professional video editor, therefore what I say in this article is a very partial view. The general laws are up to those who make the reviews. But, c hen very specific products such as a CAD program for space engineering, an expert imaging diagnostic system or, in the case of video editors, it is also necessary to know the needs of the industry. We all know what we want from a video player or a word processor. Not only programming knowledge is needed, but also about the needs of the users for whom it is intended. The big difference between free software and proprietary software is the amount of resources available for development.
0 kommentar(er)
